<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big 12 Archives - KRUI Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="https://krui.fm/tag/big-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://krui.fm/tag/big-12/</link>
	<description>Iowa City&#039;s Sound Alternative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Chaos Brews for College Football Playoff Committee</title>
		<link>https://krui.fm/2017/11/29/chaos-brews-college-football-playoff-committee/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keegan Turnbough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama Crimson Tide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10 Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big 10 football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12 Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Playoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA championships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Saban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State Buckeyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Sooner Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State Nittany Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ohio State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The University of Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Badgers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krui.fm/?p=39607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Countless Upsets Stir Limitless Playoff Combinations One month ago, the College Football world told itself that the 4-team playoff would be filled with ease once again. At the time, the SEC, ACC, Big 10, and Big 12 conferences each presumed to be represented by their champion. Only the Big 12 conference’s presumed representative is the same as prior with the top of the rankings left to chaos. Oklahoma continues to hum past the remainder of the Big 12. The following list withhold the schools who were in the top 6 a month ago and still are today: Alabama. That’s it. &#8230; <a href="https://krui.fm/2017/11/29/chaos-brews-college-football-playoff-committee/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://krui.fm/2017/11/29/chaos-brews-college-football-playoff-committee/">Chaos Brews for College Football Playoff Committee</a> appeared first on <a href="https://krui.fm">KRUI Radio</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Countless Upsets Stir Limitless Playoff Combinations</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">One month ago, the College Football world told itself that the 4-team playoff would be filled with ease once again. At the time, the SEC, ACC, Big 10, and Big 12 conferences each presumed to be represented by their champion. Only the Big 12 conference’s presumed representative is the same as prior with the top of the rankings left to chaos. Oklahoma continues to hum past the remainder of the Big 12. The following list withhold the schools who were in the top 6 a month ago and still are today: Alabama. That’s it. The cast of teams surrounding the dominant</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_39619" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-39619" style="width: 239px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-39619" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/saban-300x286.jpg" alt="" width="239" height="228" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/saban-300x286.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/saban.jpg 635w" sizes="(max-width: 239px) 100vw, 239px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-39619" class="wp-caption-text">Nick Saban, Coach of Alabama, watches squad fall to #6 Auburn (Credit: ESPN)</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Alabama squad has shifted a great deal week by week. However, the phrase of “dominant” cannot be attached to </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nick Saban’s team following last weekend’s contest. Upsets shake the world of College Football once again.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Throughout the previous month, the shapings of the playoffs have begun to take form. No team outside of Wisconsin and Central Florida makes out of the regular season unscathed. #1 Alabama fell to #6 Auburn in the Iron Bowl. The same outcome befell #2 Miami as they lost to an unranked Pittsburgh. Just two weeks prior, #9 Washington fell. #1 Georgia steamrolled #10 Auburn and #3 Notre Dame exposed by #7 Miami.  #6 TCU battles and loses to #5 Oklahoma. And lastly, #6 Ohio State received a beating in Iowa City to the unranked Hawkeyes.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_39621" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-39621" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-39621" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/iowa-field-rush-300x180.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="180" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/iowa-field-rush-300x180.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/iowa-field-rush-768x461.jpg 768w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/iowa-field-rush.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-39621" class="wp-caption-text">Iowa Hawkeye fans rush the field after 55-24 victory the game against the Ohio State Buckeyes at Kinnick Stadium. (Credit: Jeffrey Becker-USA TODAY Sports)</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Penn State fell off the planet after being ranked second in the nation a month earlier before losses against #6 Ohio State and #24 Michigan State. Upsets have completely ravaged the top 10 of the College Football rankings week after week.</span></p>
<h3>Playoff Ramifications</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Despite all of these upsets eliminating teams from playoff contention, eight teams still have a chance at making the playoffs. This amount of teams is the highest by such a large margin in the history of the playoffs. The following teams are currently contending for the top 4 spots: Clemson, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Auburn, Alabama, Miami, Georgia, and Ohio State. Among these, there are no certains. None whatsoever. Here are all the likely possibilities.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If Clemson, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Auburn all win in their respective conference championship games, each of them will compete for the playoffs in no particular order. This particular scenario plays out with Alabama being the first team out of the playoffs. Alabama losing to Auburn head to head and Auburn winning the SEC championship defends this scenario. If Clemson loses, Miami will make the national semifinal game in Clemson’s place. If Wisconsin or Oklahoma lose, however, the outcome may not be so simple. Alabama may take one of those places, so Ohio State or even potentially Georgia could retain the spot. If Auburn loses to Georgia, Georgia simply replaces Auburn in the playoffs. However, of all these contingencies, as a lifelong sports fanatic since birth and self-proclaimed expert since, the following is my prediction for the playoffs.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">#1 &#8211; Auburn. After beating Georgia and Alabama in three weeks with both teams being ranked one at the time and defeating a #7 Georgia again in the upcoming week in the conference championship, Auburn rises the number one slot in the playoffs.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_39623" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-39623" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-39623" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Auburn-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="198" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Auburn-300x198.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Auburn.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-39623" class="wp-caption-text">Auburn celebrates following win over #1 Georgia (Credit: oregonlive.com)</figcaption></figure>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">#2 &#8211; Clemson. First, this Saturday, Clemson will defeat Miami for the ACC Championship. Second, I cannot put Clemson at number one in the nation for only two reasons. Syracuse and schedule strength. The lone loss in Clemson’s repertoire is facing Syracuse. A loss against Syracuse is inexcusable. Despite Clemson defeating Auburn in a head to head matchup and Auburn having two losses to Clemson’s one, Auburn has proven in the last three weeks and will continue to prove once again this week that Auburn is the hottest and the best team in the nation.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">#3 &#8211; Oklahoma. The Sooners hold strong in a rematch against TCU in the Big 12 Championship game and retain their previously given slot from the College Football Playoff Committee. Oklahoma deserves to be in the Playoffs but does not own the resume to be placed higher than here.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">#4 &#8211; Alabama. The Big 10 will miss out of the playoffs for the first year. A two-loss Ohio State Big 10 champion will not make the playoffs as a two-loss Big 10 champ in Penn State missed out on the playoffs in 2016. Wisconsin has not faced a single worthy opponent all year and Ohio State has faced Oklahoma and Penn State as well as rivalry games against Michigan and Michigan State. The Big 10 will do as the Big 12 has done multiple times and beat itself out of the playoffs. This leaves Alabama to enjoy a rematch of the Iron Bowl against Auburn in the National Semifinals on New Year&#8217;s Day.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This Saturday will without doubt deliver with multiple conference championship throughout the day. Oklahoma-TCU at 11:30 CST on FOX. Georgia-Auburn at 3:00 CST on CBS. Clemson-Miami at 7:00 CST on ABC and Wisconsin-Ohio State at the same time on FOX. Each of these games will determine College Football Playoff selections with the official ranking show occuring on Sunday, December 3rd at noon.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_39625" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-39625" style="width: 350px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-39625" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2018-300x169.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="197" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2018-300x169.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2018-960x540.jpg 960w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2018-768x433.jpg 768w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2018-1024x578.jpg 1024w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2018.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-39625" class="wp-caption-text">Credit: Itoro Umontuen @ fansfavoritefan.com</figcaption></figure>
<p>The post <a href="https://krui.fm/2017/11/29/chaos-brews-college-football-playoff-committee/">Chaos Brews for College Football Playoff Committee</a> appeared first on <a href="https://krui.fm">KRUI Radio</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 21st Century&#8217;s Best Dynasty</title>
		<link>https://krui.fm/2015/03/12/21st-centurys-best-dynasty/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Elonich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[76ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama Crimson Tide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appalachian State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Ravens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS championship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Celtics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowl games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buckeyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavaliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Champions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[championship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Cavaliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college volleyball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College World Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college wrestling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Avalanche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference championships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimson TIde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Pistons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Blue Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Gators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gamecocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Popovich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis Colts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual champions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Hawkeyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Jayhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky WIldcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kobe Bryant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[krui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KRUI.FM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LeBron James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longhorns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March Madness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mavericks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA championships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Nets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans Saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Yankees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Tar Heels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota State Bison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State Buckeyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma State Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State Nittany Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia 76ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pistons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remember me for centuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Antonio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Antonio Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaquille O'Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina Gamecocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Louis Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st. louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Buccaneers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Lightning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Longhorns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trojans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UConn Huskies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Trojans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volleyball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrestling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yankees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YMCA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krui.fm/?p=25750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the turn of the millennium sports have taken on a whole new look. Rules have changed, superstars have become larger than ever, our favorite players are now owners and fantasy sports are nearly trumping the importance of reality. Although the landscape of professional athletics continues to evolve, one aspect has maintained familiarity; teams still win. Some much more than others. “Dynasty” is term loosely tossed around to describe successful teams after championship runs. In most modern sports, the talent pool has proven too deep to have a classic, 20th-century, dynasty such as the 50s Yankees, 60s Celtics or 90s &#8230; <a href="https://krui.fm/2015/03/12/21st-centurys-best-dynasty/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://krui.fm/2015/03/12/21st-centurys-best-dynasty/">The 21st Century&#8217;s Best Dynasty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://krui.fm">KRUI Radio</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the turn of the millennium sports have taken on a whole new look. Rules have changed, superstars have become larger than ever, our favorite players are now owners and fantasy sports are nearly trumping the importance of reality. Although the landscape of professional athletics continues to evolve, one aspect has maintained familiarity; teams still win. Some much more than others.</p>
<p>“Dynasty” is term loosely tossed around to describe successful teams after championship runs. In most modern sports, the talent pool has proven too deep to have a classic, 20<sup>th</sup>-century, dynasty such as the 50s Yankees, 60s Celtics or 90s Cowboys. Those squads dominated and left little question as to which team was the best in their respective eras. While that same scenario may not exist in all major United States sports, we can garner at least a debate.</p>
<p>In this piece we will dive into the top dynasties since the first season post-2000 started of each major sport between the college and professional levels and decide which recent squad has had dominated its respective sport the most. There are rules that will be followed.</p>
<ol>
<li>There will be a qualified team picked out of each individual sport before jumping to a final debate on who is the king of kings.</li>
<li>One team must be chosen out of each major sport – college football, men’s/women’s basketball, baseball, wrestling, volleyball, MLB, NBA, NFL and NHL.</li>
<li>Seasons that are currently in progress (2014-15 college hoops, NBA, NHL) are not included. For example, Kentucky’s current undefeated record in college hoops cannot be applied to their opportunity to be considered college basketball’s top dynasty on the men’s side.</li>
<li>Dynasty is a term used far too often. Are the Seahawks a dynasty because of how great their defense is in the past two years? No, because Seattle struggled through a lot of down seasons beforehand. In this piece, a dynasty will be defined as “Dominating a respective sport, while simultaneously competing for championships to the tune of being the greatest team in the discussed era.”</li>
<li>A team must consistently be in championship contention, but in order to be a dynasty in this span – a team <strong>must</strong> have won at least a single title.</li>
<li>I cannot compare teams between sports, as that will happen in the follow up article, where I will rank the selections from each league.</li>
</ol>
<p>Let the games begin.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">NBA</span></strong></p>
<p>The NBA has always had a lack of parity.  We may no longer be limited to just the Lakers and Celtics, but the situation is still heavily lopsided.</p>
<p>Starting in the 2000-01 season, just three out of 14 Western Conference champions haven’t been named either the Los Angeles Lakers or the San Antonio Spurs. The Dallas Mavericks made two Finals appearances, and the Oklahoma City Thunder briefly showed up before being ousted in five by the LeBron James-led Miami Heat.</p>
<p>The Eastern Conference has been more diverse, but less successful. Seven teams (Philadelphia, Brooklyn, Detroit, Miami, Cleveland, Boston, and Orlando) have won the conference, but just three (Detroit, Miami, Boston) have managed to end the postseason with a victory.</p>
<p>The Heat have an impressive five title appearances and three championships to make a case for a potential top-NBA dynasty in the last 14 seasons. However, they fall well short of the Western Conference rivals from California and Texas.</p>
<p>The Spurs have a cumulative regular season record of 804-328 (.710), a postseason tally of 129-80 (.617), and four championships in five appearances since 2000. Their worst record in that span is 50-32 in 2009, and yet they still made it to the Western Conference Semifinals. Gregg Popovich has led this team to being easily the most consistent of all NBA squads in this era.</p>
<p>Los Angeles, albeit currently in its lowest moment in franchise history, also has an argument to be the representative for professional hoops. While their 690-442 (.610) overall regular season mark is well below San Antonio’s, their post season record of 108-66 trumps the Spurs. In six Finals appearances, the Lakers have taken home four titles – equal to the Spurs. If the 1999-2000 season and the first third of the Shaq-Kobe three-peat were included, my final decision may not have been…</p>
<figure id="attachment_25751" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25751" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Pop.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-25751" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Pop-300x209.jpg" alt="Greg Popovich coached the Spurs to being one of the most consistent franchises in sports." width="300" height="209" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Pop-300x209.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Pop.jpg 620w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25751" class="wp-caption-text">Greg Popovich coached the Spurs to being one of the most consistent franchises in sports.</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: San Antonio Spurs.</strong> The Spurs, led by a long-time coach and familiar players, have (somehow quietly) been one of the most consistent teams in all of American athletics. Their YMCA-style of play may not captivate casual audiences with oohs and awes, but their record says all that is needed. The Lakers have missed the playoffs as many times (two) as the Spurs have missed the second round. The ability to avoid down years is what makes the difference. San Antonio and Los Angeles have the same highs, but the Spurs have yet to hit a low this century.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable mention:</strong> Los Angeles Lakers, Miami Heat</p>
<p><strong>NFL</strong></p>
<p>Baltimore, New England, Pittsburgh and the New York Giants have all won multiple titles since Super Bowl XXXV, thus obviously deserving of recognition in this analysis. Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Green Bay and Seattle will also be included as to compare all Super Bowl victors.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="125"></td>
<td width="125">Super Bowls</td>
<td width="125">Division Titles</td>
<td width="125">Reg. Season W-L</td>
<td width="125">Postseason W-L</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">Baltimore</td>
<td width="125">2</td>
<td width="125">4</td>
<td width="125">144-96 (.600)</td>
<td width="125">15-8 (.652)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">Green Bay</td>
<td width="125">1</td>
<td width="125">8</td>
<td width="125">151-88-1 (.632)</td>
<td width="125">9-10 (.474)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">Indianapolis</td>
<td width="125">1</td>
<td width="125">9</td>
<td width="125">160-80 (.667)</td>
<td width="125">12-12 (.500)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">New England</td>
<td width="125">4</td>
<td width="125">12</td>
<td width="125">175-65 (.729)</td>
<td width="125">21-8 (.724)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">New Orleans</td>
<td width="125">1</td>
<td width="125">4</td>
<td width="125">132-108 (.550).</td>
<td width="125">7-5 (.583)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">N.Y. Giants</td>
<td width="125">2</td>
<td width="125">4</td>
<td width="125">129-111 (.538)</td>
<td width="125">10-5 (.667)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">Pittsburgh</td>
<td width="125">2</td>
<td width="125">7</td>
<td width="125">154-85-1 (.644)</td>
<td width="125">12-6 (.667)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">Seattle</td>
<td width="125">1</td>
<td width="125">7</td>
<td width="125">132-108 (.550)</td>
<td width="125">11-8 (.579)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="125">Tampa Bay</td>
<td width="125">1</td>
<td width="125">3</td>
<td width="125">106-134 (.442)</td>
<td width="125">3-4 (.429)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Looking based simply off of this, the answer is penciled in. Let’s engrave it in stone with this next chart. I gave every team a point total for each category – the top team receiving nine points and the bottom receiving one &#8211; (regular season win percentage, total postseason wins, postseason win percentage, division titles and Super Bowls). The point total depended on where a team finished in each respective section.</p>
<table style="height: 212px;" width="752">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="62"></td>
<td width="62">Bal</td>
<td width="62">GB</td>
<td width="62">Ind</td>
<td width="62">NE</td>
<td width="62">NO</td>
<td width="62">NYG</td>
<td width="62">Pit</td>
<td width="62">Sea</td>
<td width="62">TB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="62">RS %</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
<td width="62">6</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">9</td>
<td width="62">4</td>
<td width="62">2</td>
<td width="62">7</td>
<td width="62">4</td>
<td width="62">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="62">PS wins</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">3</td>
<td width="62">7</td>
<td width="62">9</td>
<td width="62">2</td>
<td width="62">4</td>
<td width="62">7</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
<td width="62">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="62">PS %</td>
<td width="62">6</td>
<td width="62">2</td>
<td width="62">3</td>
<td width="62">9</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">4</td>
<td width="62">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="62">DT</td>
<td width="62">4</td>
<td width="62">7</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">9</td>
<td width="62">4</td>
<td width="62">4</td>
<td width="62">6</td>
<td width="62">6</td>
<td width="62">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="62">SB</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
<td width="62">9</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">8</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
<td width="62">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="62"><strong>Points</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>31</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>23</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>31</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>45</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>20</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>26</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>36</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>24</strong></td>
<td width="62"><strong>9</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<figure id="attachment_25752" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25752" style="width: 220px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Brady.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-25752" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Brady-300x225.jpg" alt="Tom Brady has been the face of the Patriots during the vast majority of their time at the top since the turn of the century." width="220" height="165" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Brady-300x225.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Brady.jpg 534w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 220px) 100vw, 220px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25752" class="wp-caption-text">Tom Brady has been the face of the Patriots for the better part of the 21st century.</figcaption></figure>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: New England Patriots. </strong>New England swept the board in each measurable category. It’s hard to tell if they’re farther ahead of the pack than Tampa Bay is behind. Tom Brady and Bill Belichick have created a dynasty and are two absurd catches from having six Super Bowls in this span, including the Brady-Randy Moss 2007 combination that was the best team in NFL history to not win it all.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">NHL</span></strong></p>
<p>The NHL has experienced more parity than its professional counterparts this century. Ten teams have won a Stanley Cup in the last 13 occurrences (plus the 2005 lockout season). The Boston Bruins, Pittsburgh Penguins, Anaheim Ducks, Carolina Hurricanes, Tampa Bay Lightning, New Jersey Devils and Colorado Avalanche have all taken home one championship, while the Los Angeles Kings, Chicago Blackhawks and Detroit Red Wings all have a pair of titles. To avoid confusion in the following chart, the NHL did away with ties during this span and therefore the records will be Win-Loss-Overtime Losses-Ties.</p>
<table style="height: 918px;" width="826">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="104"></td>
<td width="104">Stanley Cups</td>
<td width="146">Reg. Season Record</td>
<td width="60">Points</td>
<td width="106">Postseason record</td>
<td width="104">Playoff appearances</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">L.A. Kings</td>
<td width="104">2</td>
<td width="146">479-405-102-46 (.486)</td>
<td width="60">1,106</td>
<td width="106">55-41 (.573)</td>
<td width="104">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Chicago</td>
<td width="104">2</td>
<td width="146">486-391-110-45 (.492)</td>
<td width="60">1,127</td>
<td width="106">58-41 (.586)</td>
<td width="104">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Boston</td>
<td width="104">1</td>
<td width="146">530-347-115-40 (.534)</td>
<td width="60">1,215</td>
<td width="106">63-52 (.548)</td>
<td width="104">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Pittsburgh</td>
<td width="104">1</td>
<td width="146">515-399-87-31 (.514)</td>
<td width="60">1,148</td>
<td width="106">67-54 (.554)</td>
<td width="104">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Detroit</td>
<td width="104">2</td>
<td width="146">611-276-105-40 (.616)</td>
<td width="60">1,367</td>
<td width="106">87-73 (.544)</td>
<td width="104">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Anaheim</td>
<td width="104">1</td>
<td width="146">507-382-105-38 (.510)</td>
<td width="60">1,157</td>
<td width="106">61-42 (.592)</td>
<td width="104">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Carolina</td>
<td width="104">1</td>
<td width="146">466-415-101-50 (.475)</td>
<td width="60">1,083</td>
<td width="106">39-33 (.542)</td>
<td width="104">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Tampa Bay</td>
<td width="104">1</td>
<td width="146">457-432-102-41 (.461)</td>
<td width="60">1,057</td>
<td width="106">35-32 (.522)</td>
<td width="104">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">Colorado</td>
<td width="104">1</td>
<td width="146">524-378-86-44 (.530)</td>
<td width="60">1,178</td>
<td width="106">49-44 (.527)</td>
<td width="104">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="104">New Jersey</td>
<td width="104">1</td>
<td width="146">558-341-90-43 (.564)</td>
<td width="60">1,249</td>
<td width="106">63-58 (.521)</td>
<td width="104">10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>          </strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_25753" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25753" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Red-Wings.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-25753" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Red-Wings-300x200.jpg" alt="The Red Wings have an incredible 17 playoff series victories since 2000, even despite a lockout in 2005." width="300" height="200" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25753" class="wp-caption-text">The Red Wings have an incredible 17 playoff series victories since 2000, even despite a lockout in 2005.</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>  </strong>We have seven categories (Stanley Cups, playoff appearances, playoff series victories, postseason wins, postseason win percentage and regular season win percentage and points). The best team in each category will receive 10 points and the worst will pick up just one. In order to put a stronger emphasis on advancing in the postseason, playoff series victories will count as a point for each accumulated. This should counteract disciplining teams for advancing on to tougher rounds just to be swept.</p>
<table width="636">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="72"></td>
<td width="60">LAK</td>
<td width="54">Chi</td>
<td width="54">Bos</td>
<td width="60">Pit</td>
<td width="54">Det</td>
<td width="60">Ana</td>
<td width="54">Car</td>
<td width="54">TB</td>
<td width="54">NJ</td>
<td width="60">Colo</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72">SC</td>
<td width="60">10</td>
<td width="54">10</td>
<td width="54">7</td>
<td width="60">7</td>
<td width="54">10</td>
<td width="60">7</td>
<td width="54">7</td>
<td width="54">7</td>
<td width="54">7</td>
<td width="60">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72">PA</td>
<td width="60">5</td>
<td width="54">5</td>
<td width="54">9</td>
<td width="60">7</td>
<td width="54">10</td>
<td width="60">5</td>
<td width="54">1</td>
<td width="54">2</td>
<td width="54">9</td>
<td width="60">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72">PW</td>
<td width="60">4</td>
<td width="54">5</td>
<td width="54">8</td>
<td width="60">9</td>
<td width="54">10</td>
<td width="60">6</td>
<td width="54">2</td>
<td width="54">1</td>
<td width="54">8</td>
<td width="60">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72">PSV</td>
<td width="60">11</td>
<td width="54">12</td>
<td width="54">10</td>
<td width="60">12</td>
<td width="54">17</td>
<td width="60">11</td>
<td width="54">9</td>
<td width="54">7</td>
<td width="54">12</td>
<td width="60">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72">PW%</td>
<td width="60">8</td>
<td width="54">9</td>
<td width="54">6</td>
<td width="60">7</td>
<td width="54">5</td>
<td width="60">10</td>
<td width="54">4</td>
<td width="54">2</td>
<td width="54">1</td>
<td width="60">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72">RSW%</td>
<td width="60">3</td>
<td width="54">4</td>
<td width="54">8</td>
<td width="60">6</td>
<td width="54">10</td>
<td width="60">5</td>
<td width="54">2</td>
<td width="54">1</td>
<td width="54">9</td>
<td width="60">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72">Points</td>
<td width="60">3</td>
<td width="54">4</td>
<td width="54">8</td>
<td width="60">5</td>
<td width="54">10</td>
<td width="60">6</td>
<td width="54">2</td>
<td width="54">1</td>
<td width="54">9</td>
<td width="60">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="72"><strong>Tot. Pts</strong></td>
<td width="60"><strong>44</strong></td>
<td width="54"><b>49</b></td>
<td width="54"><strong>56</strong></td>
<td width="60"><strong>53</strong></td>
<td width="54"><strong>72</strong></td>
<td width="60"><b>50</b></td>
<td width="54"><strong>27</strong></td>
<td width="54"><b>21</b></td>
<td width="54"><strong>55</strong></td>
<td width="60"><strong>42</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: Detroit Red Wings. </strong>Outside of postseason win percentage, Detroit swept the board since 2000. Its 17 postseason series victories is even more impressive when factoring in the lockout season and the fact that no other franchise has more than a dozen. Despite parity among Stanley Cup victors, Detroit has easily been the most consistently dominant in all of professional hockey. Not much of an argument can be made for any other squad from this chart, and therefore none are honorable mention worthy.</p>
<p><strong>Men’s college basketball:</strong></p>
<p>After a relatively easy start, we reach what might be the most complicated of all sports we list. College basketball is about as random as they come (see odds of making a perfect bracket). Of course, Kentucky seems like an obvious choice after winning a national title in 2013-14 and going undefeated so far in 2014-15 (void). Don’t let fresh tastes discount distant memories.</p>
<p>Recent impressions can’t influence this decision, but the Wildcats have enough beyond that to make a pretty decisive statement. A 369-124 overall record is tough to argue with. What’s even harder? Twelve NCAA Tournament appearances, eight Sweet Sixteens, three Final Fours and a 1-1 record in the championship. Take away the two seasons Billy Gillispie coached Kentucky to a 40-27 overall record with zero NCAA Tournament victories and an NIT berth, and the Wildcats may blow the competition out of the water.</p>
<p>One team has been so remarkably consistent in its conference that it’s impossible to leave off this list: The Kansas Jayhawks.</p>
<p>After transitioning from a Hall of Fame coach, Kansas found a fate much simpler than Kentucky. Bill Self took over Roy Williams’ squad and didn’t miss a beat.</p>
<p>Williams’ last three seasons resulted in a 42-6 conference record that was overshadowed by a Sweet Sixteen, Final Four and a championship appearance. Since? Self has given the Jayhawks a 325-69 mark with a 151-31 stretch in the Big 12.</p>
<p>Self’s initial tournament resume left much to be desired with two first round exits sandwiched between a pair of Elite Eight showings. That turned around quickly with Kansas’ lone national title during this span in 2008.</p>
<p>Kansas boasts similar marks to Kentucky, with one extra championship loss thrown in, and its down years were first round exits over being completely left out.</p>
<p>So how about ex-Jayhawk coach Williams’ new squad – North Carolina? The Tar Heels have two national titles and another Final Four on their record and they may not even be the best dynasty in their own <em>state.</em></p>
<p>Recent 1,000 game winner Mike Kryzewski’s Duke Blue Devils are.</p>
<p>Duke has a pair of national titles, has appeared in the tournament in each covered year, and has lost in their opening matchup just three times. Their conference dominance may not be as high as a team such as Kansas, but the competition is relatively stellar each season.</p>
<p>The Blue Devils hold an absurd 412-87 (.826) record in this span. So it has to be them, right?111</p>
<p>Let’s head over to Big Ten country where Tom Izzo is standing by for a quick lecture on postseason play. Michigan State, although missing its 1999-2000 national championship by just one season, has made nine Sweet Sixteens, five Elite Eights, four Final Fours, and has won one title. They haven’t missed the tournament a single time, and have been eliminated before the Round of 32 just four times.</p>
<p>What about UConn’s three title runs? Florida’s star-studded squads? Kentucky’s heated-rival Louisville? We need a way to rank these teams accordingly as to put all bias aside and assign an overall score. Postseason play in college basketball has always taken precedence over any other measurement of success. Here is the scoring chart to decide the top NCAA Tournament team since 2001’s tournament when solely considering those whom have a title to their name in this span:</p>
<p><strong>Round of 64 loss: 0 points<br />
Round of 32 loss: 1 point<br />
Sweet 16 loss: 2 points<br />
Elite Eight loss: 4 points<br />
Final Four Loss: 8 points<br />
Championship loss: 12 points<br />
Championship: 16 points</strong></p>
<p><strong>NCAA Tournament champions results since 2000-01 March Madness:</strong> Kansas 68, UConn 67, Duke 59, North Carolina 56, Florida 55, Kentucky 55, Michigan State 51, Louisville 44, Syracuse 37, Maryland 30.</p>
<p>Shockingly, outside of its three titles runs, UConn only scored 19 points on this scale. The Huskies fell just a point shy of claiming this all important statistic in pushing forward to choosing men’s college hoops’ most dominant dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Despite just one title, consistency overcame roller coaster levels of postseason success and your winner is…</p>
<figure id="attachment_25754" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25754" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/jayhawks.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-25754" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/jayhawks-300x197.jpg" alt="Kansas has dominated the Big 12 as much as one team can. Ten consecutive conference titles and a slim margin of victory against UConn in  sustained postseason success gave them the nod." width="300" height="197" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/jayhawks-300x197.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/jayhawks-768x505.jpg 768w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/jayhawks-1024x673.jpg 1024w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/jayhawks.jpg 1948w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25754" class="wp-caption-text">Kansas has dominated the Big 12 as much as one team can. Ten consecutive regular season conference titles and a slim margin of victory against UConn in sustained postseason success gave them the nod.</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: Kansas Jayhawks. </strong>Not only has Kansas (almost surprisingly) performed as the top overall team in March Madness, but it also has the most eye-popping accomplishment. I’m going to type this out to make it even more drastic: Kansas has won at least a share of (ahem) back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back regular season Big 12 championships. That’s 10. Read that out loud and you’re likely to need to catch your breath. This isn’t Kansas playing in the Summit League or intramural athletics – this is a major conference with a tough road to the top every season. Ten?! In a row? And just for the record, it’s also 12 of 13, but who’s counting? The Huskies have a legitimate argument when it comes to this discussion due to three incredible runs to the championship, but Kansas has been a more consistently feared team. Welcome to a new postseason tournament, Jayhawks. Let’s see who else is joining you.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable mention:</strong> Duke, UConn</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Women’s College Basketball</span></strong></p>
<p>I went from one of the more difficult sports to choose to what might be the easiest. UConn women’s hoops is out of this world. <em>Seven</em> championships since the turn of the century. Average margin of victory in those title-winning contests? 15.4 points. That’s <em>15 points</em> better than the second best team in the country. Talk about a talent gap. I can’t put into words how unbelievably incredible the Huskies’ overall record has been, so I’ll leave two simple numbers on its own.</p>
<p>486-38.</p>
<p>That’s a .927 winning percentage.</p>
<p>I could play myself in checkers and not win 93 percent of the time.</p>
<p>Connecticut has missed out on the Sweet Sixteen in this span only…well, they haven’t. And just once were they limited to that. On top of the Sweet Sixteen and seven titles, the Huskies have made two Elite Eight appearances along with four Final Fours. Therefore, your clear cut winner without any hesitation is…</p>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: Connecticut Huskies.</strong></p>
<p><strong>College Wrestling</strong></p>
<p>If the 70s, 80s and 90s were included, this wouldn’t even be a competition. The Iowa Hawkeyes took home 20 titles from 1975-2000. Despite those all being out of the picture, Iowa is still in contention for the 21<sup>st</sup> century title post-Dan Gable. The Hawkeyes have three titles to their name, which comes shy of Penn State and Oklahoma State, who put together four each. With the overall team title competition so close, our answer comes from individual championships. The Nittany Lions have nine, Hawkeyes 13 and Cowboys 18.</p>
<p>Oklahoma State’s 2005 season was the best of the era, fielding five individual champions in 10 weight classes, and scoring 153 points – best since the 1997 Hawkeyes scored 170. Therefore the winner is…</p>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: Oklahoma State Cowboys. </strong>The Cowboys are tied for the lead in titles, have the best overall team of the era and can claim having the most individual titles. They may be fortunate to wrestle outside the Big Ten, but national titles don’t lie.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention:</strong> Iowa Hawkeyes, Penn State Nittany Lions</p>
<p><strong>MLB</strong></p>
<p>Four teams have won multiple titles since 2000 – the Red Sox (three), Giants (three), Yankees (two) and Cardinals (two) – to give a clear starting point when trying to declare the top 21<sup>st</sup> century dynasty of professional baseball.</p>
<table style="height: 176px;" width="795">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="108"></td>
<td width="96">World Series Titles</td>
<td width="90">Division Titles</td>
<td width="132">Reg. Season Record</td>
<td width="101">Postseason Record</td>
<td width="97">Playoff Appearances</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="108">Boston</td>
<td width="96">3</td>
<td width="90">2</td>
<td width="132">1336-1093 (.550)</td>
<td width="101">45-28 (.616)</td>
<td width="97">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="108">N.Y. Yankees</td>
<td width="96">2</td>
<td width="90">10</td>
<td width="132">1421-1005 (.586)</td>
<td width="101">59-47 (.557)</td>
<td width="97">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="108">St. Louis</td>
<td width="96">2</td>
<td width="90">8</td>
<td width="132">1364-1065 (.557)</td>
<td width="101">64-57 (.529)</td>
<td width="97">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="108">San Francisco</td>
<td width="96">3</td>
<td width="90">4</td>
<td width="132">1291-1136 (.532)</td>
<td width="101">45-27 (.625)</td>
<td width="97">6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It’s clearly visible that this is a dead heat. You know the drill. In order to decide, I assigned a point total to each stat category. The top finisher in each category – World Series victories, division titles, regular season winning percentage, playoff appearances, total playoff wins and postseason playoff winning percentage – receives four points, followed by three for second place and so on. I also gave teams an extra point for each playoff series they won. The final tally came out as followed:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="210"></td>
<td width="102">Yankees</td>
<td width="96">Cardinals</td>
<td width="102">Red Sox</td>
<td width="114">Giants</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210">World Series Titles</td>
<td width="102">2</td>
<td width="96">2</td>
<td width="102">4</td>
<td width="114">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210">Division Titles</td>
<td width="102">4</td>
<td width="96">3</td>
<td width="102">1</td>
<td width="114">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210">Regular Season Win %</td>
<td width="102">4</td>
<td width="96">3</td>
<td width="102">2</td>
<td width="114">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210">Postseason wins</td>
<td width="102">3</td>
<td width="96">4</td>
<td width="102">2</td>
<td width="114">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210">Postseason win %</td>
<td width="102">2</td>
<td width="96">1</td>
<td width="102">3</td>
<td width="114">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210">Playoff appearances</td>
<td width="102">4</td>
<td width="96">4</td>
<td width="102">2</td>
<td width="114">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210">Playoff series victories</td>
<td width="102">12</td>
<td width="96">16</td>
<td width="102">11</td>
<td width="114">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="210"><strong>Total points</strong></td>
<td width="102"><strong>31</strong></td>
<td width="96"><strong>33</strong></td>
<td width="102"><strong>25</strong></td>
<td width="114"><strong>25</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: St. Louis Cardinals. </strong>Any fan of one the final four teams can state a statistic on how their team deserved to be the one represented. New York dominated the AL East. Boston and San Francisco won a third World Series and were more efficient in the postseason when they did make it. None of that jumped out the way this did:</p>
<p>The Cardinals took the cake with <em>16</em> postseason series victories.</p>
<figure id="attachment_25755" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25755" style="width: 210px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Cards.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-25755" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Cards-300x200.jpg" alt="The Cardinals are flying high - but barely - over three strong competitors. Postseason appearances and consistent success were the difference." width="210" height="139" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Cards-300x200.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Cards.jpg 380w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 210px) 100vw, 210px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25755" class="wp-caption-text">The Cardinals are flying high &#8211; but barely &#8211; over three strong competitors. Postseason appearances and consistent success were the difference.</figcaption></figure>
<p>That’s out of this world consistent. The Yankees came close, carried by consistently owning the division crown, whereas the two teams that take advantage of playoff appearances the most, Boston and San Francisco, found themselves looking up.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention:</strong> Boston Red Sox, New York Yankees, San Francisco Giants</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>College Volleyball</strong></p>
<p>Some of these don’t take much time. Penn State has six championships, including two 38-0 seasons. USC, Stanford, Nebraska, Texas and UCLA have had strong programs, but none have approached the dominance by the Nittany Lions. Let’s just get to the point. Without a hint of doubt, your winner is…</p>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: Penn State Nittany Lions.</strong></p>
<p><strong>College Baseball</strong></p>
<p>Unlike most of the other sports in the discussion, the full 2000 season is included since it began post-millennium. Texas, South Carolina and Oregon State all have a pair of titles, with nobody else claiming more than one. Naturally, only those three are in consideration. However, the Beavers have only made four CWS appearances compared to six for South Carolina and eight for Texas. Typically that would lead one to believe that the answer is obviously the Longhorns.</p>
<p>Take a look at overall winning percentage: Texas is 661-294 (.664) in this millennium, lagging considerably behind the Gamecocks at 713-289 (.712). So what do we value? Winning more regular season games against what is typically stronger competition, or taking overall postseason play? The latter carries more weight. Here is how each team fared in NCAA Tournament play with its overall statistics tallied at the bottom.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="208"></td>
<td width="208">South Carolina</td>
<td width="208">Texas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2014</td>
<td width="208">2-2</td>
<td width="208">8-3, CWS Appearance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2013</td>
<td width="208">8-2, CWS runner up 4-2, lost in Super Regional</td>
<td width="208">No appearance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2012</td>
<td width="208">8-2 CWS runner up</td>
<td width="208">No appearance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2011</td>
<td width="208">10-0 CWS champion</td>
<td width="208">5-4, CWS appearance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2010</td>
<td width="208">10-1, CWS champion</td>
<td width="208">4-2, lost in Super Regionals</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2009</td>
<td width="208">2-2</td>
<td width="208">9-3, CWS runner up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2008</td>
<td width="208">2-2</td>
<td width="208">2-2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2007</td>
<td width="208">4-2, lost in Super Regional</td>
<td width="208">2-2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2006</td>
<td width="208">4-3, lost in Super Regional</td>
<td width="208">1-2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2005</td>
<td width="208">3-2</td>
<td width="208">11-2, CWS champions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2004</td>
<td width="208">8-2, CWS appearance</td>
<td width="208">8-2, CWS runner up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2003</td>
<td width="208">1-2</td>
<td width="208">7-3, CWS appearance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2002</td>
<td width="208">9-4, CWS runner up</td>
<td width="208">9-1, CWS champions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2001</td>
<td width="208">5-3, lost in Super Regional</td>
<td width="208">2-2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">2000</td>
<td width="208">4-2, lost in Super Regional</td>
<td width="208">6-3, CWS appearance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="208">Total</td>
<td width="208"><strong>Total:</strong> 713-289 (.712) regular season record. Three regular season SEC titles, One SEC Tournament championship, five SEC East championships. 76-31 (.710) postseason record, five CWS appearances, two CWS championships, five Super Regional losses, 15 tournament appearances</td>
<td width="208"><strong>Total:</strong> 661-294 (.664) regular season record. Seven regular season Big 12 titles, four Big 12 tournament championships. 74-31 (.705) postseason record, eight CWS appearances, two CWS championships, one Super Regional loss, 13 NCAA tournament appearances.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: Texas Longhorns. </strong>In what ended up being the closest contest of any sport so far, Texas prevailed because of one statistic: CWS appearances. South Carolina may hold a relatively significant advantage in regular season record and have a slim lead in postseason record, but they couldn’t get the job done in enough Super Regionals. One could argue that Texas’ lows were below South Carolina’s, but they consistently made the trip to Omaha and that familiarity with getting to the final eight put them over the edge.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">College Football</span></strong></p>
<p>Alabama, Ohio State, LSU, and Florida all have multiple FBS championships to their names, while Appalachian State and North Dakota State have dominated the FCS level well enough to be included in the discussion. USC vacated one of its two national championships and will not be considered. As we’ve come to find out, tables can be really useful when measuring statistics of multiple teams. Unfortunately, college football has more variables than most so let’s compare like it is 2000 (and we’re using WordPad).</p>
<p><strong>Alabama:</strong> The Crimson Tide are the only team in this span with three FBS national title victories. Their overall record takes a hit because of 21 vacated wins, but stands at 116-57, including a 6-5 bowl mark – which is also hindered by one vacated victory and two seasons in which ‘Bama was ineligible for the postseason. They have garnered three SEC titles and five SEC West crowns – most of which have come under Nick Saban. The pre-Saban era was somewhat dark for Alabama, which had a (now shocking) 3-8 season in 2000. The loss of 21 victories could really come back to bite the team that is likely the first one on everybody’s college football power shortlist.</p>
<p><strong>Florida:</strong> Florida boasts two national titles (thanks, Tebow) complemented by a 137-56 overall record. If Alabama had kept its wins, Florida would be one game ahead in the loss column and tied with the Tide for overall victories. In bowl play, Florida has a lackadaisical 7-6 mark. They have picked up three SEC Titles and have headed the SEC East four times.</p>
<p><strong>LSU:</strong> Consistency in a more than tough conference is what could separate LSU from the group. Like every team on this list besides Alabama, the Tigers have a pair of national championships. Their overall record of 151-45 is only topped by Ohio State. They’ve won nine bowl games compared to six losses and have not missed out on the postseason. They’ve picked up four conference titles and five SEC West titles along the way to top both Florida and Alabama in those areas.</p>
<p><strong>Ohio State:</strong> Surprised to see a Big Ten team here? You shouldn’t be. Despite a negative stigma built around the conference in recent years, Ohio State has been among the most dominant teams lately. The Buckeyes’ 157-36 overall record is hard to argue with. An 8-7 bowl record with a few postseason embarrassments could be improved on. What really couldn’t be is a sensational seven conference titles – which reasonably would be eight if not for a postseason ban on a 12-0 squad in 2012. The Buckeyes may not have the numbers to claim best of this century now, but with Urban Meyer pulling the strings, it might not be too long until they do.</p>
<p><strong>North Dakota State:</strong> If we were only talking about the last four years, the Bison would breeze through the competition. Their 63-3 record with four national titles is, well, absurd. Before that? North Dakota State swiftly comes back to Earth with a more reasonable, but still strong, 74-40 mark. Did you already do the math? That’s an overall record of 137-43</p>
<p>…and I should probably mention they have a 20-2 postseason record.</p>
<p>20 wins. Two losses.</p>
<figure id="attachment_25756" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-25756" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NDSU.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-25756" src="http://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NDSU-300x204.jpg" alt="The North Dakota State Bison have become one of the most feared squads in college football - both FCS and FBS. " width="300" height="204" srcset="https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NDSU-300x204.jpg 300w, https://krui.fm/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NDSU.jpg 606w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-25756" class="wp-caption-text">The North Dakota State Bison have become one of the most feared squads in college football &#8211; both FCS and FBS.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The Bison made the move from Division II to FCS in this time period and were ineligible for postseason play in multiple 10-1 seasons, otherwise they very well could have added to that title total. Which, quite frankly, is a little scary. One thing that isn’t as scary is <a href="http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=303242623">this game</a>. And <a href="http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=302472305">this one</a> in the same season. Sometimes you find things while researching that you wish you never did. Those qualify.</p>
<p><strong>Appalachian State:</strong> While the Bison were fiddling around with moving up from Division II, another squad was busy winning national championships and <a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=272440130">knocking off the winningest-program in FBS history</a>. That was the Mountaineers of Appalachian State. Their record of 131-52 is a modest amount below North Dakota State’s. It isn’t the regular season that separates these two FCS programs. The Mountaineers postseason mark, despite a three-peat from 2005-2007, is 19-8, considerably worse than the Bison’s…let me say it again…<em>20-2.</em></p>
<p><strong>Top Dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century</strong><strong>: North Dakota State Bison. </strong>I get it. Strength of schedule for the Bison isn’t anywhere near what Ohio State, let alone Alabama, Florida and LSU, face on a week-to-week basis. Their national titles are much less publicized and viewed. They don’t have NFL prospects filling up the first round. They weren’t even in the FCS for part of this era. There are a lot of reasons not to pick them.</p>
<p>Go ahead, write an article on why LSU’s consistency in the SEC makes them the best dynasty of this century, or why Alabama’s three titles set it apart, or how Ohio State’s conference dominance make them the frontrunner. They all have strong cases to disprove my choice.</p>
<p>To me, these issues have to be made relative, not directly compared. Of course North Dakota State doesn’t have to play the LSU defense, the Tim Tebow offense or Nick Saban’s game plan on an annual basis, but they ought to be held to the standards of their competition, not of a league above them. North Dakota State has simply dominated about as much as a modern college football team can in this span. 137-43 in the regular season? Incredible – just as incredible as the others on this list, especially considering transition seasons. That doesn’t set them apart.</p>
<p>A .909 winning percentage in the postseason will. When the Bison play the best competition, they don’t just compete – they absolutely own everyone. Alabama doesn’t. Florida doesn’t. LSU and Ohio State don’t. They’re all tremendous teams, but have not set themselves apart at any part this century the way the Bison have.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>The aforementioned follow-up article will now include the St. Louis Cardinals, San Antonio Spurs, New England Patriots, Detroit Red Wings, Kansas Jayhawks men’s hoops, UConn Huskies women’s basketball, Oklahoma State wrestling, Penn State volleyball, Texas baseball and North Dakota State football. Those ten dominant teams will be ranked to determine an ultimate “dynasty of the 21<sup>st</sup> century.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Be sure to check out Night Stuff on KRUI at the stroke of midnight Wednesday mornings as we discuss topics such as this, other sporting news and a few outrageous topics mixed in with a phone always ready to hear your takes. Did you like the article or happen to disagree with some of the choices? Tweet @TheMainStevent or @KRUISports to share your opinion.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://krui.fm/2015/03/12/21st-centurys-best-dynasty/">The 21st Century&#8217;s Best Dynasty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://krui.fm">KRUI Radio</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
